April 7, 2025

U.S. Delivers Larger than Expected Tariffs

U.S. President Trump’s tariff announcement has ushered in a historic escalation of U.S. trade protectionism. (1)

The effective U.S. import-weighted tariff rate has surged to 26% - its highest level in over a century - following the implementation of a reciprocal tariff regime that penalizes trading partners based on their perceived trade barriers. While Canada may have avoided the worst, a 5% effective tariff on Canadian exports still represents a meaningful shift in cross-border trade dynamics. For Canadian investors, this evolving policy backdrop brings implications for inflation, growth, and portfolio construction.

A Tariff Shock with Global Reverberations

(2)Under the new U.S. framework, all countries face a 10% baseline tariff, with significant variations above that depending on country-specific trade policies. Vietnam and China were targeted most aggressively (46% and 34%, respectively), while U.S. allies such as Canada and Mexico benefit from partial exemptions—conditional on United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) compliance.


These tariffs are expected to raise (3) up to $700 billion in annual U.S. customs revenue. If that revenue is recycled into consumer tax cuts, the economic drag could be modest. However, if used for deficit reduction, the U.S. may face a fiscal tightening exceeding 2% of gross domestic product (GDP)—an outcome that could stall growth and increase recession risks. We have downgraded our expectations for U.S. equities significantly considering our expectations for a weaker economic backdrop and geopolitical uncertainty in technology and trade.

Canada’s Temporary Relief, Lingering Risk

Canada was spared the full impact of the new U.S. tariffs, with compliant USMCA goods exempt. However, that protection is contingent. Sectors like automotive and agriculture still face margin pressure from compliance costs and shifting rules of origin. And while Canada may compare favorably to Asia or the European Union, its historical trade advantage has eroded as other allies (e.g., the U.K. and Brazil) receive the baseline 10% tariff with less restrictive terms. Moreover, if U.S. demand slows as a result of higher consumer prices, Canada’s export-heavy economy could feel the ripple effects. Any downturn in the U.S. could quickly spill into Canadian manufacturing and energy.

Tariffs are Not Costless

Despite political rhetoric, tariffs function as a consumption tax—paid by importers, not exporters. They raise input costs, distort supply chains, and ultimately feed into consumer inflation. We expect the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) to rise above 4% this year due to tariff-driven price pressures. In Canada, inflation remains softer, but a weaker Canadian dollar—if monetary divergence between the Bank of Canada (BoC) and the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) persists—could import price pressures at a fragile moment for domestic demand.

A Flawed Fix for the Trade Deficit

The stated rationale for these tariffs—to reduce the U.S. trade deficit —deserves scrutiny. As economist Maurice Obstfeld of the Peterson Institute argues, America’s trade imbalance is primarily a function of domestic policies: a chronic under-saving problem driven by persistent fiscal deficits and a tax system that prioritizes consumption (4) . Tariffs may shift the composition of trade, but they will not solve the underlying imbalance.


Douglas A. Irwin, the John French Professor of Economics at Dartmouth College and a leading authority on trade policy, echoes this view. In his work, including the widely respected books (5) Free Trade Under Fire and (6) Clashing over Commerce: A History of U.S. Trade Policy, Irwin argues that the U.S. trade deficit is less a symptom of foreign unfairness and more a result of domestic fiscal imbalances and a tax system that discourages savings. The solution, he suggests, lies in restoring fiscal discipline, reforming tax incentives, and encouraging investment and savings rather than relying on tariffs that ultimately burden consumers. 

Portfolio Implications: Building Resilience

In this environment of rising protectionism and geopolitical tension, diversification and risk management are paramount. We believe consideration should be given to:


  • High-quality, domestic-oriented Canadian equities: Companies less exposed to cross-border supply chains may benefit from reduced uncertainty and resilient margins.



  • U.S. exposure: While exposure to the U.S. is an essential element in Canadian portfolios, the April 2 announcement of larger-than-expected tariffs on U.S. imports has led us to believe that the economic backdrop will no longer be sufficiently conducive to a rally in equities. Secondly, the shift in the AI narrative has shaken conviction that technology will drive up the index.


  • Uncorrelated alternatives: Managed futures and other non-long only strategies can help mitigate volatility linked to trade and currency shocks

Conclusion 

For Canada, the immediate shock may appear manageable, but the broader implications are more profound: a more fragmented trade regime, less policy coordination, and higher volatility in cross-border economic activity. Navigating this landscape will require strategic agility, diversified portfolio construction, and close monitoring of trade developments.


While Canada may have avoided the harshest blows, this is not a moment for complacency. Tariffs are not costless — and their full economic, inflationary, and geopolitical consequences will take time to materialize. This is a reminder that economic and portfolio resilience must be actively built — not assumed or incorporated after the fact — in a world where policy risk has returned to the forefront of global investing.


Sincerely,

Corrado Tiralongo

Vice President, Asset Allocation & Chief Investment Officer

Canada Life Investment Management

1 Tax Foundation. (2025) Trump Tariffs: The Economic Impact of the Trump Trade War. Retrieved from https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/trump-tariffs-trade-war/

2 Newsweek. (2025) Trump Tariff Chart: Full List of Countries Hit with 'Reciprocal' Tariffs. Retrieved from https://www.newsweek.com/trump-reciprocal-tariff-chart-2054514

3 Wall Street Journal. (2025) Economists: Tariffs to Raise $700 Billion for U.S. and Boost Inflation. Retrieved from wsj.com/livecoverage/trump-tariffs-trade-war-stock-market-04-02-

4 Wall Street Journal. (2025) Piper Sandler Economists Forecast Tariffs Will Spur Higher Inflation, Economic Contraction. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/trump-tariffs-trade-war-stock-market-04-02-2025/card/

5 Douglas A. Irwin. (2015) Free trade under fire

6 Douglas A. Irwin. (2017) Clashing over Commerce: A History of U.S. Trade Policy


The views expressed in this commentary are those of Canada Life Investment Management as at the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. Prospective investors should review the offering documents relating to any investment carefully before making an investment decision and should ask their advisor for advice based on their specific circumstances. The content of this material (including facts, views, opinions, recommendations, descriptions of or references to, products or securities) is not to be used or construed as investment advice, as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, or an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any entity or security cited. Although we endeavour to ensure its accuracy and completeness, we assume no responsibility for any reliance upon it. 


This material may contain forward-looking information that reflects our or third-party current expectations or forecasts of future events. Forward-looking information is inherently subject to, among other things, risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed herein. These risks, uncertainties and assumptions include, without limitation, general economic, political and market factors, interest and foreign exchange rates, the volatility of equity and capital markets, business competition, technological change, changes in government regulations, changes in tax laws, unexpected judicial or regulatory proceedings and catastrophic events. Please consider these and other factors carefully and not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. The forward-looking information contained herein is current only as of April 7, 2025. There should be no expectation that such information will in all circumstances be updated, supplemented or revised whether as a result of new information, changing circumstances, future events or otherwise. 

Counsel mutual funds are managed by Canada Life Investment Management Ltd., a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of The Canada Life Assurance Company (“Canada Life”). Canada Life is a wholly owned subsidiary of Great West-Lifeco Inc. (TSX: GWO) and a member of the Power Corporation Group of companies. Investment Planning Counsel Inc. is a fully integrated wealth management company. Trademarks owned by Investment Planning Counsel Inc. and licensed to its subsidiary corporations.